GovernmentExecutive.com

In a recent review of federal facilities used to detain suspected illegal immigrants, the Government Accountability Office found a lack of telephone access to be a pervasive problem, potentially preventing detainees from contacting legal counsel, their countries' consulates or complaint hotlines.

The GAO review included visits to 23 detention centers housing immigrants awaiting adjudication or deportation. The watchdog agency observed the centers -- run by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency within the Homeland Security Department -- for compliance with nonbinding national detention standards.

Of the 23 facilities GAO reviewed, 17 had telephone systems allowing detainees to make free phone calls seeking assistance. In 16 of these 17 facilities, however, GAO found systemic problems hindering phone access. Issues ranged from inaccurate or outdated numbers posted by the phones to technical problems preventing completion of calls, the report (GAO-07-875) stated.

The review found instances where the centers fell short of standards in other areas, such as medical care, use of force and food services, but said these instances did not necessarily indicate a larger pattern of noncompliance.

"While it is true that the only pervasive problem we identified related to the telephone system -- a problem later confirmed by ICE's testing -- we cannot state that the other deficiencies we identified in our visits were isolated," said Richard Stana, director of homeland security and justice issues at GAO, in the report.

GAO recommended that ICE regularly update the posted numbers for legal services, consulates and reporting violations of detainee treatment standards and test phone systems to ensure that they are in working order.

In a response to a draft of the report, Steven Pecinovsky, director of the Homeland Security Department's GAO/Office of the Inspector General Liaison Office, said ICE concurred with GAO's recommendations and had taken immediate steps to implement them. In particular, ICE has started random testing to ensure the phones can access the necessary numbers.

While GAO did not find evidence of widespread disregard for national detention standards, there have been recent calls for more oversight of immigrant detention facilities and codification of standards. According to the American Bar Association's Commission on Immigration, the fact that the standards are not codified means "their violation does not confer a cause of action in court."

On Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union called on Congress to codify the standards, expressing concern over the causes of death for the 62 immigrants who have died in ICE custody since 2004.

GAO's report cited several instances of noncompliance in the standards for medical care, but almost all were a failure to complete the routine physical exams required for all detainees. The only other issue cited was the failure of one detention center to have a first aid kit available. The ACLU argued there are far more serious medical failures occurring in immigrant detention centers.

"Inadequate medical care has led to unnecessary suffering and death," the ACLU said in a statement. "In addition, there is no mechanism in place for reporting deaths in immigration detention to any oversight body, including the [Office of the Inspector General] and, therefore, there are no routine investigations into deaths in ICE custody."

COMMENTS

• Most of the facts have been skimmed over in this article. When anyone is arrested in the US they are allowed ONE phone call. Why should the American taxpayer have to provide food, shelter, medical care (if necessary) and free telephone service for these illegal aliens? Would an American citizen be allowed unlimited telephone access from a Mexican jail or prison? I know not! Why should the illegal aliens have better treatment than an American citizen? Illegal aliens have no right; if they want respect they should respect the laws of the land. Let them come to the US legally and they can have the same rights as other American citizens. American Taxpayer Posted August 2, 2007 4:05 PM
• While it's important to treat immigrants like the human beings they are, the U.S. should also be looking at what we can do to aleviate the burden we're putting on other countries that is resulting in so much immigration. We're screwing over other countries with imperialistic agreements like NAFTA, and then not letting people survive. That's the thing: Hunger Has No Borders. Really, now. We're all a bunch of immigrants anyway! California land was Mexico's, all of this land was tribe land--then a bunch of rebels from England come over on a big boat and decide they're going to keep out the hungry. The ethnocentricity of this country blows my mind. If we want to keep out immigrants, instead of breaking up families that are already here and terrorizing neighborhoods, abusing people and making profits off detention centers, violating immigrants' rights all the time, how about we stop ruining their home country's economy? That would stop immigration for real. This INS/ICE nonsense isn't helping "keep immigrants out," it's totally ineffective and in fact is strengthening the immigrant and immigrant rights communities here. Gaia Posted July 19, 2007 4:42 PM
• Regarding the comment from Dan Ketter: The problem is we ARE sending them home! Sending someone back to their country of origin isn't an instantaneous thing. And you can't just let people roam around willy nilly -- you have to detain them somewhere until you can arrange for them to leave. The problem this article describes occurs in the places we are detaining people before they leave. "Send[ing] them all home", as you suggest, would not eliminate the need for detainment facilities; it would probably make the situation worse. Now, you may suggest that the folks being sent home should be treated like cattle or worse, but a lot of people would disagree with you. My belief is that a good person, a good society or a good government follows the Golden Rule: to treat others as you would like to be treated. Anything else is, in word, immoral. Janet Posted July 13, 2007 1:28 PM